This is the recent traffic on the #SPF-council IRC channel on irc.pobox.com. Anyone may join the channel, but only council members can talk.

If you do not have access to IRC, you may view the recent traffic at: http://www.schlitt.net/spf/spf-council/now/irc_log.html.

This log can be can be viewed at: http://www.schlitt.net/spf/spf-council/2006/01/08_irc_log.html.

IRC nicknames:
freesideMeng Weng Wong
gconnorGreg Connor
grumpyWayne Schlitt
JulianJulian Mehnle
MarkKMark Kramer (asarian-host.net)

--- Fri Dec 8 12:54:27 UTC 2006 ---
12:54<Julian>grumpy: Do you think we can have a meeting this week?
--- Sat Dec 9 00:46:20 UTC 2006 ---
00:46<Julian>grumpy: What's the status of your council election procedures write-up?
18:16<Julian>grumpy: We need to conduct the vote approving our council election decisions before the end of the year, and at least one week would be required for each of registration/discussion and voting, i.e. at least two weeks!
18:17<Julian>s/vote/community vote/
18:19<Julian>Due to a lucky coincidence in this year's calendar, the very, very latest opportunity to start that process is Monday 2005-12-19. The end of voting would then be on 2006-01-01 at 00:00 UTC.
18:19<Julian>I would prefer to start on 12-12, however.
--- Sun Jan 8 11:35:51 UTC 2006 ---
11:35<Julian>freeside: ping
15:58<MarkK>good afternoon
15:59<Julian>Hi there
15:59<Julian>We have no volunteers for the election officer so far.
15:59<Julian>At least none who have confirmed that they'd be willing.
16:02<MarkK>that sucks; I really hope John P. will volunteer again; he did an excellent job last year. Maybe ppl are just waiting for all nominations to be in?
16:04<Julian>Yesterday, I explicitly asked the three who were nominated (sort of), JohnP included, if they were willing to do it <http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com/200601/0049.html>. No replies except from Frank.
16:05<MarkK>Yeah, I saw frank's reply.
16:05<Julian>I admit it was at quite short notice, but oh well...
16:06<MarkK>so, is everybody present?
16:06<Julian>It's 16:06 UTC only. I guess Greg and Wayne will show up around 16:45.
16:06<Julian>I hope...
16:11<grumpy>I'm here now. was it supposed to start at 16:00 or 17:00?
16:11*grumpy forgot how "early" 16:00 UTC is...
16:14<MarkK>16:00 was 14 minutes ago :)
16:17<grumpy>it is only 8:17 AM for GregC. You might want to send him an email reminding him...
16:49<Julian>Well, it was Greg who said that anything after 16:00 UTC would be fine. So I guess we won't have to wake him or something. ;-)
16:49<MarkK>Precisely. :)
16:49<Julian>T = -11min
16:50<MarkK>T = +50min :)
16:51<Julian>Didn't we want to wait until 17:00?
16:51<Julian>(...not that we had any other choice.)
16:53<Julian>freeside: ping
16:53<Julian>(...not that I'd actually expect a pong.)
16:53<MarkK>you'll probably get a 'moo'
16:54<Julian>That'd be fine,too. ;-)
17:01<MarkK>wayne, care to add your email to the agenda? then we can vote on it tonight; otherwise, we'd be discussing it when you are already gone.
17:02<grumpy>I thought it was already on the agenda...
17:04<MarkK>I do not see it at: http://archives.listbox.com/spf-council@v2.listbox.com/200601/0006.html
17:04<Julian>What e-mail?
17:04<MarkK>(btw, with "we'd be discussing" I mean the new Council, of course)
17:05<MarkK>about the credit for domain names
17:05<grumpy>OOOoohh
17:05<grumpy>uh, yeah
17:06*Julian is confused.
17:07<grumpy>see my post to SPF-webmasters as of 10 minutes ago
17:07<grumpy>basically: the credits for donating the domain names have been up for 2 months now, and yesterday I noticed that this is the text that some search engines ar showing for every webpage
17:08<grumpy>So, I think it is time to move the credits to the bottom of just the main web page
17:08<Julian>"see my post to SPF-webmasters as of 10 minutes ago" -- Oh, that.
17:08<MarkK>yeah; and I think we do well to vote on it tonight, and get it out of the way
17:08<Julian>Ok.
17:08*grumpy bets that there won't be a quorum, but...
17:08<MarkK>T + 8
17:08*grumpy is *WAY* too grumpy
17:09<Julian>I do expect Greg to show up soon.
17:09<grumpy>did you send a reminder email?
17:09<Julian>...though I cannot say the same for Meng.
17:09<MarkK>it would be pretty embarassing if we cannot get quorum for our last meeting. :)
17:09<Julian>No, I haven't sent him a reminder mail.
17:10<MarkK>Since Greg himself suggested 16:00 UTC, you'd think he will come
17:10<grumpy>I think it is sunday morning and he is following a routine that doesn't include SPF council meetings...
17:11<Julian>I have now sent him a reminder.
17:11<MarkK>why is wayne *WAY* to grumpy, btw?
17:12<MarkK>too, even
17:15<MarkK>freeside?
17:31<MarkK>now *I* may get grumpy, lol; maybe we should reschedule?
17:32<Julian>Yeah, but to when??
17:32<MarkK>somewhere in the neighboorhood of 22:00 UTC?
17:33<MarkK>like usual
17:33<Julian>MarkK: Dare you say you have a live outside SPF and want to do something other than idling in #spf-council with your Sundays? ;-)
17:34<Julian>"a life", ahem.
17:34<Julian>Well, sure, let's reschedule. I have no idea however if Wayne and Greg would show up then...
17:35<MarkK>in truth, I need to go out for a moment, any time soon; so, indeed, I cannot keep waiting for another few hours
17:35<Julian>grumpy: Do you have time later?
17:35<grumpy>sure
17:35<Julian>Ok, let's try to meet again between 21:00 and 22:00 UTC.
17:35<MarkK>ok
21:05<Julian>Hi Mark!
21:05<MarkK>good evenig; hope we have better luck now
21:06<Julian>I have heard nothing from Greg.
21:06<MarkK>hhm, bummer; cuz I doubt meng will be here
21:12<Julian>This is making me sick...
21:15<MarkK>sigh
21:16<Julian>freeside: ping
21:18<Julian>Ok, guys, if we don't have quorum by 22:00 UTC, I suggest we proceed anyway and ignore the quorum rule. I just can't see breaking the election when so much time and work has been invested into it.
21:18<Julian>grumpy: You there?
21:20<MarkK>It seems we're the only ones
21:21<Julian>Well, he said he would be there, and Wayne usually sticks to his promises.
21:21<MarkK>we hardly have quorum with two people; we need at least 3 to have some sort of credibility; I have good hopes wayne will show up, though
21:21<MarkK>yes
21:24<MarkK>I'm gonna make some late-night coffee; brb
21:26<Julian>Perhaps defining the council election period as one year wasn't such a good idea after all. Why do people have to go AWOL like this?
21:27<Julian>...or should I say MIA?
21:28<MarkK>I dunno; it seems like a crappy way to go out like this. :(
21:55<MarkK>T -5
22:02<MarkK>wayne?
22:03<Julian>grumpy?
22:04<Julian>Let's wait a few more minutes, perhaps Wayne was planning to be here at 22:00 UTC but is now late.
22:04<Julian>Who knows what he uses his Sundays for? Perhaps seeing his kids? ;-)
22:05<MarkK>yes
22:09<grumpy>ouch
22:09<grumpy>sorry
22:09<MarkK>good; there he is :)
22:11<Julian>I need another 3 minutes.
22:11<grumpy>yes, I did think it was 22:00 UTC...
22:11<grumpy>and yes, I was seeing my kids
22:12<Julian>Heh.
22:12<grumpy>Hi Greg!
22:13<gconnor_l>heh, sorry I missed the meeting time
22:13<Julian>w00t!
22:13<Julian>gconnor_l: How did you know to show up _now_?
22:13<grumpy>I was an hour late to this meeting time too...
22:14<MarkK>behold, we have quorum!
22:14<gconnor_l>I just now checked mail and got your message, so I came right over to see if you were still here
22:14<grumpy>for what it is worth, since I'm not running for Council, I can volunteer to be the election officer.
22:14<grumpy>I would prefer someone else, but...
22:14<gconnor_l>much apologies :)
22:14<Julian>gconnor_l: So you (and we) were lucky. :-)
22:15<Julian>Ok, I know my invitation to this last meeting was not the friendliest one, and it wasn't very far in advance, but it seemed necessary to me.
22:16<Julian>I was sort of swamped with all the election tasks, so I forgot to do some things early, like the invitation to this meeting.
22:16<gconnor_l>Not a problem, I didn't observe any unfriendliness for what it's worth :)
22:16<Julian>Can we officially start?
22:16<grumpy>sure
22:16<Julian>See $topic for today's agenda, which is quite short.
22:17<MarkK>yes
22:17<Julian>As you may have noticed, I managed to write two more meeting minutes:
22:17<Julian>http://new.openspf.org/Council_Meeting/2005-05-04
22:17<Julian>http://new.openspf.org/Council_Meeting/2005-05-18
22:17<MarkK>yes, I read them
22:17<Julian>Who has not read them?
22:17<grumpy>me!
22:17*grumpy blushes
22:17<gconnor_l>I'm reading right now
22:18<Julian>Ok, let's pause for ~4min.
22:19<Julian>Say when you're finished reading.
22:19<gconnor_l>Ok I re-read it :)
22:20<gconnor_l>I have nothing to add to the agenda
22:20<grumpy>Oh, I'm a slow reader, but I've skimmed them
22:20<grumpy>and they look about right to me
22:21<Julian>Ok, motion: please approve the 2005-05-04 and -18 meetings.
22:21<MarkK>22:21u: yes
22:21<Julian>I take that as a "second".
22:21<grumpy>seconded
22:21<MarkK>yes, sorry
22:21<Julian>Votes?
22:21<gconnor_l>22:21u: abstain :)
22:21<grumpy>22:21u yes
22:21<MarkK>22:21u: yes
22:22<Julian>22:21u: yes
22:22<grumpy>gconnor_l: why abstain?
22:22<gconnor>I wasn't at those meetings :)
22:22<grumpy>duh
22:22<grumpy>"nevermind"
22:22<Julian>Greg wasn't with us yet when those meetings took place.
22:22<Julian>Anyway, so ordered. Thanks.
22:22<Julian>Next item: 2. Formal confirmation of Wayne's resignation from the council.
22:23<Julian>I'd like to have a short discussion first. Objections?
22:23<grumpy>22:22 seconded
22:23<grumpy>oh, wait, I retract my second then
22:23<gconnor>No objections, just ...
22:23<Julian>grumpy: Was there any _specific_ reason which made you resign?
22:24<gconnor>It seems that we're drawing close to the time when it would become a moot point :)
22:24<grumpy>other than I am not being productive with SPF, and not doing the stuff that I really need to do as a council member, no.
22:24<grumpy>yeah, but I threw things onto others to take care of the election and stuff.
22:24<grumpy>sorry
22:24<grumpy>and thank you Julian
22:24<Julian>Hmm, ok. I thought that maybe I or someone else had annoyed you.
22:24<grumpy>no
22:25<grumpy>believe me, if I get pissed, I let people know.
22:25<grumpy>1/2 ;-)
22:25<gconnor>Even if you choose not to formally resign, I don't think there are really any upcoming responsibilities that you can't be excused from. IMO
22:25<grumpy>well, among other things, I should have organized the agenda and meeting
22:25<Julian>Anyway, I'd like to say I'm very sad to see you go. You've been a huge element of the council and of the project.
22:25<grumpy>well, I'm not planning on leaving the project
22:26<gconnor>How about resigning as chair and keeping your member status until the elections get confirmed?
22:26<MarkK>well, I think you did terrific work for SPF. But if you feel no longer motivated, then I cannot but respect that, of course
22:26<Julian>grumpy: That's good to know, because you wanted to work on the test suite. ;-)
22:26<grumpy>I need to do so many things, and I've been a putz...
22:27<grumpy>anyway, I guess I assumed that you would bring in someone new, just like we brought in Greg
22:27<gconnor>I would probably not seek to replace you at this late stage... I believe we are less than a month from a new council being seated, right?
22:27<Julian>grumpy: That didn't seem appropriate since we were only so short before the election, and we could only accept your resignation today.
22:28<MarkK>at this pooint, bringing in someone new seems undoable or not worth the trouble, really (just for one last meeting)
22:28<grumpy>ok, well it is all moot now
22:28<Julian>It would also have been a joke for whoever would have replaced you.
22:28<grumpy>not really, at least not in my opinion
22:28<gconnor>in that case I move that the resignation be "tabled indefinitely" :)
22:29<grumpy>but, anyway, there are several more meetings that are going to need to be done
22:29<grumpy>to deal with the election
22:29<grumpy>right?
22:29<gconnor>Oh... really?
22:29<Julian>Only if disputes are submitted, I guess.
22:29<grumpy>Hmmm
22:29<Julian>Otherwise, today is our last convention.
22:29<grumpy>I thought there was an approval of the vote thing
22:29<MarkK>I thought this was our last one, no?
22:30<Julian>I don't think the new council should need to be approved by the old one.
22:30<gconnor>In any case, if there are additional meetings, and you miss them, you'll still have a better attendance record than, say, me :)
22:30<Julian>Any council member can submit a dispute if something goes terribly wrong with the election.
22:30<grumpy>ok
22:30<grumpy>well
22:31<gconnor>If there are no disputes, I expect we can each just write a note to the spf-council list and say "so long, thanks for the fish, good luck you guys"
22:31<Julian>grumpy: Ok, anyway, I assume you're not going to retract your resignation as a council member (as opposed to from the chair)?
22:31<grumpy>I have effectively been gone and Julian has, thankfully, stepped forward and organized the eleciton and the meeting.
22:31<grumpy>yeah, I guess if you think it would be productive (like to deal with meng being awol), I can just resign as chair
22:32<gconnor>I would support that.
22:32<Julian>It would definitely help. Otherwise I was going to move that the quorum be lowered to 3 for election related issues later.
22:32<grumpy>that might be the safe thing to do anyway. 1/2 :-<
22:33<Julian>Hell, I don't know why Meng hasn't shown us the respect of resigning a few months ago.
22:33<gconnor>If we can't get a quorum on #spf-council, there's always email
22:33<Julian>True.
22:34<MarkK>lets face it, we lost meng a long time ago.
22:34<Julian>Ok, grumpy, what will it be? :-)
22:34<grumpy>motion: accept my resignation as Chair
22:34<Julian>21:34u: seconded.
22:34<Julian>22:34u: seconded.
22:34<Julian>(uhh...)
22:34<gconnor>22:34u: yes
22:34<grumpy>votes?
22:35<grumpy>22:34u yes
22:35<Julian>22:34u: yes
22:35<Julian>wait(MarkK)
22:35<MarkK>22:34u: yes
22:35<Julian>So ordered.
22:35<MarkK>(with sadness, though
22:35<MarkK>)
22:35<Julian>Wayne, thanks a lot for your work as chairman!
22:36<grumpy>sure
22:36<Julian>Now, should we choose a new chairman for the rest of the term?
22:36<gconnor>22:35: seconded!!!
22:36<grumpy>thanks for doing all the minutes and such
22:36<grumpy>ok, what's next? elect a new chair?
22:37<Julian>I think we should have one. But it should be someone who isn't secretary.
22:37<Julian>Unless we want to elect a new secretary also, I'd suggest Mark or Greg.
22:37<gconnor>secretary, that would be you?
22:37<Julian>gconnor: Yeah...
22:38<Julian>Mark, would you be willing to be the chair?
22:38<MarkK>I can do it for the time being
22:38<gconnor>what are the responsibilities (remaining) for secretary?
22:39<Julian>Writing the minutes, organizing the election (the parts that are not done by the election officer), not much more at this stage, I guess.
22:39<MarkK>I always thought the secretary would took the position of the chair in case the chair stepped down; but I guess I thought wrong. :)
22:39<grumpy>doing the minutes is a lot of work
22:39<Julian>MarkK: AFAIR, the executive director was supposed to be vice chair.
22:40<Julian>grumpy: Yes, definitely...
22:40<MarkK>julian: yes, you're right; but I guess we can forget about the executive director
22:40<Julian>True...
22:41<Julian>Ok, I move that Mark be the chair for the remaining weeks.
22:41<grumpy>seconded
22:41<Julian>Second it or make another motion.
22:41<MarkK>the way things look, I do not think he'll be back in the new council, either (but I haven't checked all nominations, to be sure)
22:41<Julian>MarkK: Meng has been nominated.
22:41<Julian>Votes for 22:41u?
22:41<grumpy>2241u yea
22:41<gconnor>2241u: yes
22:41<Julian>22:41u: yes
22:42<MarkK>yes, but I did no see a second for him, did you? (not that it matters, really, as this is quite off-topic anyway)
22:42<Julian>Mark?
22:42<MarkK>22:41u: yes
22:42<Julian>Ok, Mark, do you accept?
22:42<MarkK>yes, of course
22:42<Julian>Great, we have a new chair. Thanks, Mark.
22:42<Julian>Last item.
22:43<Julian>3. Appoint a neutral election officer for the coming council elections.
22:43<MarkK>I had John Pinkerton in mind; but wayne just volunteered too, I believe
22:43<grumpy>I would rather have someone else do it
22:43<Julian>Only Nick Nicholas, Frank Ellermann, and John Pinkerton have been nominated or have suggested themselves on spf-discuss.
22:44<Julian>We aren't bound to that, though.
22:44<MarkK>John P. did a very good job last year
22:44<grumpy>but FrankE said now, right?
22:44<Julian>We can pick whoever we want, we should only be prepared to back up our decision.
22:44<grumpy>yeah, but he hasn't been very active recently
22:44<Julian>I think Frank declined, yeah.
22:45<Julian>I have contacted the three yesterday but haven't heard of them (except for Frank).
22:45<MarkK>frank declined for council, too
22:45<grumpy>of course, being a weekend, that isn't surprising
22:45<Julian>(MarkK: Did he? I wasn't so sure about that...)
22:45<Julian>grumpy: I know. That's one of the things I missed to do earlier.
22:45<MarkK>julian: or maybe he just agreed on not liking IRC. :) It was not ambiguous a bit
22:46<Julian>I would have liked to appoint JohnP, but since he seems to be out of reach...
22:46<MarkK>(if the latter is the case, then please disregard my earlier comment, Frank)
22:46<Julian>Ok, we can really only appoint someone who is willing to do the job, which leaves us with Wayne and Nick (sort of).
22:47<Julian>I'm not sure if Nick is really willing to do it.
22:47<Julian>He said he could "assist".
22:47<gconnor>The only thing I see from Nick is: I'm not putting myself forth as a candidate for the elections officer position, but I am offering to assist as needed. I have a *considerable* amount of experience in this area."
22:48<Julian>The thing is, we need to get the registration started within the next 24h, better less than that.
22:49<grumpy>well, I can do, if need be.
22:49<grumpy>at least I think I can do it
22:49<MarkK>I could write John P again, and specifically ask him
22:49*grumpy isn't sure what all this is going to involve
22:49<Julian>Wayne, you said you'd be willing to act as elections officer, does that offer still stand?
22:49<gconnor>I can also help out, I suppose, given some help
22:49<grumpy>gconnor: are you running for the next council?
22:49<grumpy>if so, you can't be election officer
22:50<gconnor>No, I was going to mention it, I don't intend to be on the next council, though I would like to continue to serve as list-mom
22:50<grumpy>Ok, then let's let greg be the RO
22:51<MarkK>RO?
22:51<grumpy>return-officer
22:51<grumpy>sorry
22:51<Julian>Heh. I wasn't sure if "election officer" was a real term in English... Is it?
22:52<MarkK>I think it is
22:52<Julian>Anyway, Greg, would you be willing to act as the EO/RO?
22:52<gconnor>Certainly.
22:52<grumpy>seconded!
22:52<Julian>Anyone opposed?
22:52<grumpy>let's vote before he has a chance to change his mind
22:52<Julian>LOL
22:53<Julian>Ok, votes on 2252u?
22:53<MarkK>22:52u: yes
22:53<grumpy>2252u yea
22:53<Julian>2252u: yes
22:53<gconnor>2252u: yes
22:53<grumpy>thank you Greg
22:53<Julian>Ok, so ordered.
22:53<Julian>Thanks, Greg!
22:53<gconnor>You're welcome, may the best spuds win!
22:54<Julian>This leaves us in the lucky situation of being able to start the next phase of the election nearly in time. :-)
22:54<MarkK>(I could offer to help him, but I know to little about the math involved to be of any real use)
22:54<Julian>There's no math involved.
22:54<Julian>Are there any other agenda items for this last meeting of ours?
22:54<grumpy>(fyi; en.wikipedia has no entry for "election officer", but does have one for "return officer". It explains that "return officer" is used in places outside of the US.)
22:54<gconnor>I will probably want to pick julian's brain, but we can do that offline
22:55<Julian>gconnor: We can do that later, yeah.
22:55<grumpy>Uh, I think MarkK wanted to add the "Thank you" note on the website
22:55<Julian>Oh, that.
22:55<grumpy>I say: yes, let's change it. but then, I said that in my email...
22:56<grumpy>other thoughts?
22:56<Julian>Well, I think we can safely remove the blatant banner by now.
22:56<gconnor>what was the change? I missed it
22:56<MarkK>yeah, at least I want to make it official (after voting on it, of course) that we tone down the profuse wording which is up there now
22:56<Julian>http://archives.listbox.com/spf-webmasters@v2.listbox.com/200601/0003.html
22:57<Julian>I'm not sure we need a motion for that, but if someone wants one, please table it.
22:57<grumpy>Well, I appreciate the donation, and I think it was appropriate for a while.
22:58<gconnor>I agree with the spirit. Would it be OK to just leave it up to the webmaster?
22:58<Julian>In any case (motion or not), I can change it in a few minutes.
22:58<MarkK>Ok with me, I guess (as it seems the webmasters are agreeing with it, as far as I can tell)
22:58<grumpy>fyi; I learned a while back that "tabling an item" in England means "to call for a vote". In the US, it means "no longer consider it"
22:59<Julian>grumpy: Oh, I guess I used it in the British sense.
22:59<gconnor>Motion: The thank-you message can be changed at the webmaster's discretion, either text or a link on the main page being the only requirement
22:59<Julian>s/changed/toned down/
22:59<grumpy>yeah, and I think Greg used "tabled" in the US sense earlier in the meeting...
22:59<grumpy>two countries, divided by a common language.
23:00<Julian>(I generally tend to using American English.)
23:00<gconnor>:)
23:00<Julian>Motion: The thank-you message can be toned down at the webmaster's discretion, either text or a link on the main page being the only requirement.
23:00<grumpy>I think we promised a link to JamesC
23:00<MarkK>I think brittish English uses "to shelve it" for 'putting it to rest for a while'
23:01<MarkK>yes, the link can stay, as per our promises
23:01<grumpy>the US uses the same phrase the same way
23:01<Julian>grumpy: Ok. I think we should leave the note on _all_ pages, though, not just on the main page.
23:01<grumpy>I don't think we need to put it on all web pages
23:02<MarkK>I just rather the text be toned down and be moved to the bottom of the pages
23:02<grumpy>I think it is a waste of screen space
23:02<grumpy>we only promised that it would be on the front page
23:02<MarkK>I do not recall we promised 'on every page'
23:02<Julian>Motion: The thank-you message can be toned down at the webmaster's discretion, but at least a note and a link to the donators on the front page have to stay.
23:02<gconnor>Motion: The thank-you message can be changed at the webmaster's discretion, either text or a link on the main page being the only requirement
23:02<MarkK>just the front page should suffice
23:03<Julian>(This has little to do with what we promised. We can always do more than we promised.)
23:03<grumpy>great, we have two 23:02's
23:03<gconnor>I yield to Julian's version
23:03<Julian>2302u.julian vs 2302u.gconnor
23:03<MarkK>hhm, I really think just the front page will do
23:04<gconnor>I just wanted to put it on the webmaster and not have the council decide exactly what to do
23:04<grumpy>23:02u (Julian) seconded
23:04<Julian>Votes on 2302u.julian?
23:04<Julian>2302u.julian: yes
23:04<gconnor>2302u.julian: yes
23:04<grumpy>2302u.julian: yea
23:04<Julian>wait(MarkK)
23:05<MarkK>I'm confused now; I see julian saw two things: keep on all pages + keep on just the first
23:05<Julian>"<Julian> Motion: The thank-you message can be toned down at the webmaster's discretion, but at least a note and a link to the donators on the front page have to stay."
23:06<Julian>That's what I wrote at 23:02 UTC.
23:06<MarkK>oh, ok; 2302: yes
23:06<Julian>So ordered, thanks.
23:06<Julian>Any other items?
23:06<MarkK>I got confused with: "[00:01] <Julian> grumpy: Ok. I think we should leave the note on _all_ pages, though, not just on the main page."
23:07<MarkK>but that was 2301. :)
23:07<Julian>MarkK: Yeah, I changed my motion.
23:07<Julian>Any other items?
23:07<Julian>Ok, thank you so much for enabling us to conclude this council's business _gracefully_. Especially Wayne.
23:07<grumpy>thanks everyone
23:08<Julian>It was a great year, and it was a hell of a year. But it was great!
23:08<MarkK>Yes, it would have looked pretty awkward otherwise
23:08<gconnor>Yes. Thanks :)
23:08<Julian>gconnor: Thanks for joining the council mid-ways.
23:08<gconnor>No problem :)
23:08<Julian>Thanks to Chuck for being with the council the first half, and for being the chair
23:09<MarkK>We should be especially grateful to wayne for his outstanding hard work on the RFC matters
23:09<Julian>And thanks to Meng for attending countless conferences while we were wasting our time with useless meetings. ;-)
23:10<Julian>Yes, thanks, Wayne, for working on the spec! (although it is not entirely finished yet.)
23:10<MarkK>Wayne, I presume any futire council can count on your help with the IESG/IETF with finalizing the RFC, right?
23:11<MarkK>(well, that is actually no longer any of my business; I'm sure you'll be asked, though)
23:12<Julian>MarkK: Are you going to not run for the new council?
23:12<grumpy>off course...
23:12<grumpy>s/off/of/
23:13<Julian>Ok, motion: officially adjourn this meeting.
23:13<MarkK>Julian: I ran, but am not seconded; so, it looks like an entirely new crew will take over. :)
23:13<gconnor>2nd
23:13<Julian>MarkK: Secondes are not needed this time.
23:13<grumpy>23:13u yea
23:13<Julian>The election rules don't mention any seconds.
23:13<MarkK>2313: yes
23:14<gconnor>23:13u yea
23:14<Julian>Uh, votes on 2313u?
23:14<MarkK>julian: I guess I missed that
23:14<Julian>2313u: yes
23:14<Julian>So the meeting is adjourned.
23:14<gconnor>thanks everyone
23:14<MarkK>glad we did this final one so decently
23:14<Julian>Yeah, glad as hell.
23:17<MarkK>well, we (the SPF community) certainly put SPF on the map; all our detractirs despite, we had a good year
23:17<Julian>Yes, agreed.

This report was generated at Sun Jan 8 23:59:59 UTC 2006.